If this is true: “the amount of work each can produce is relatively close”, and all other things being equal (friendliness, quality of workmanship, reliability, etc), then it’s a toss-up : Same thing either way…
[INDENT][I]Example:
[B]$14/hr guy[/B] does 13 houses at $200 each during 40-hr week.
You invoice $2,600, and pay him $560 = [B]you keep $2,040.00[/B]
[B]$21/hr guy[/B] does 15 houses at $200 each during 40-hr week.
You invoice $3,000, and pay him $840 [B]= you keep $2,160.00[/B][/I][/INDENT]
Of course, I made up these numbers, you’ll have to insert your own to figure it out if it would be better either way.
I’ve found that “practical initiative” is worth far more than experience. Some workers see an obstacle, and decide “oh well, I might as well quit for the day and ask Kevin tonight after work what I should do about it…” - STUPID, and very frustrating.
Whereas a different, more practical worker may think : “Hmmm - I’m gonna try and find a way around this, before I call it a day - this might just work…”.
Sometimes it’s the experienced guy that has this initiative, sometimes it’s not. Depends on your guys. I would pay more for this trait, for sure, especially for Residential, since there are more unique challenges, every house being different…