That’s cool Seth, thanks for sharing the pic. I’ve seen that pic for years now, so it’s nice to see and hear a little background on it. It’s not everyday you see a pic of someone chowing down on a “samich”. also good to know that I was probably right all this tine about what you were eating. Now that the mystery is solved, I shall rest fitfully from now on…
Oh sorry. I always get the SLX and the SL confused. So the really lite poles can snap just by extending them the wrong way? If I paid thousands of dollars I would almost scared to use a pole that could break if I opened it improperly.
So is this why everybody has Tucker poles for the employees?
With either 6 or 7 sections attached and lying horizontal on the ground, I hold the bottom section at the end and midpoint, then pivot upwards. Lift with the midpoint hand and lower slightly with the endpoint hand, lifting slowly and steadily. There will be some flex until you are near vertical.
Both the SL and SL-X are Gardiner’s SuperLite poles. The “X” is the designation for extension (the SL is sectional/modular, meaning one assembles it with pieces end-to-end.). The SL-X’s sections are of progressively smaller diameters and fit inside each other. When extended, the sections are secured in place – at any length one desires – with clamps.
I doubt the issue with possible breakage has anything to do with lifting the length. Gardiner states that one shouldn’t use the SL at less than 30’ (I believe.). It’s engineered for strength at height, not extreme torque on sections 1 thru 6. I read one breakage story where the user was scrubbing with one or two sections horizontally between security bars, if memory serves.
The Super-light I was using snapped because I had all the sections together laying down,
put the base against the wall and tried to walk it up like I had always done with my Tucker.